|
The research, published today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), found that individuals who were exposed to high levels of prenatal testosterone tended to be more profitable traders. The team found those stock traders with a lower digit ratio of 0.93, on average, earned 10 times more than those with an average ratio of 0.988. Traders with a lower digit ratio made an average of 679,680 pounds (or about $1 million U.S.), compared with 61,320 pounds ($90,956 U.S.) by those with a higher ratio, the report said. Why? The explanation is complex: testosterone, a steroid hormone, surges between the 9th and 18th week of gestation, exerting powerful organizing effects on the developing body and brain. According to both animal and human studies, these effects may include increased confidence, risk-preferences and search persistence, as well as heightened vigilance and quickened reaction times. The amount of testosterone one was exposed to in the womb can be measured because it leaves traces throughout the adult body. Measures of prenatal androgens are increasingly used by paediatricians to gauge whether a newborn has been exposed to abnormal levels of steroid. The most common measure for behavioural studies is the ratio of the index to ring finger (2D:4D) on the right hand, a relatively longer ring finger - lower 2D:4D - indicating higher prenatal testosterone levels. Males typically have ratios below 1, women above 1. As digit ratios have been found to predict performance in competitive sports such as tennis, football, and skiing, the scientists hypothesised that 2D:4D may also influence the risk preferences and physical speed required for what is variously called noise or high-frequency. Traders engaged in high frequency trading look for fleeting price anomalies and hold their trades for minutes, sometimes mere seconds. For the experiment, the researchers recruited 49 male traders from a trading floor in the City of London. This floor employs approximately 200 traders who specialise in high-frequency trading, all but three male. The more successful traders are paid over £4 million a year.
Great care was taken to ensure that the traders all practiced the same style of trading and that their profits (P&L) reflected only their risk-taking skill. All traders therefore had equal access to capital and information. Moreover none of them benefited from an underlying client business, as do flow traders at the investment banks, flow traders' P&L partly reflecting the size of the bank's sales force rather than pure risk-taking. The Cambridge scientists - John Coates, Mark Gurnell, and Aldo Rustichini - found that individuals who scored high on the measure of prenatal testosterone tended to be more profitable traders; and they tended to remain traders longer than others. The size of the effects was surprising, with traders exposed to high levels of prenatal testosterone making on average six time the profits of traders exposed to low levels. The study draws attention to the fact, often overlooked by economists, that traders require more than a calculating mind; they must also possess confidence, an appetite for risk, and the ability to process information quickly. Furthermore, high frequency traders require additional skills because their rapid style of trading is a demanding physical activity: they engage in extended periods of vigilance and visual scanning, and they must react quickly in order to place a trade before others arbitrage it away.
John Coates, lead author and himself a former trader, said: "We were surprised to find that exposure to hormones in the womb had such a strong influence on future trading performance. But we should not conclude from this that to succeed in all types of trading you need high levels of prenatal testosterone. There are different market segments and trading styles and each of these may select for different traits. Indeed the traits that benefit high-frequency traders may prove a hindrance in positions involving more long-term investments."
THE FINGERS OF BERNARD MADOFF - 'The largest investor fraud ever': |
Related sources: |
|