|
HANDS OF A DIABETIC type 1:
featured with limited joint mobility
HANDS OF A DIABETIC type 1:
features with sclerodactyly (hard waxy skin)
TOP 10 HAND SIGNS
IN DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE 1:
(Ranked by 'Log Odds Ratio' = LOR)
I - Thick, waxy/hardening skin on back of hand (sclerodactyly)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-1: LOR = +4.58]
II - Dry scally palm
[Diabetes hand sign 6-8: LOR = +3.47]
III - Limited joint mobility (LJM)
[Diabetes hand sign 7-1: LOR = +2.98]
IV - Pink patches on back of the hand / fingers (granuloma annulare lesions)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-3: LOR = + 2.73]
V - Shiny patches, first: red-brown & painless, later: yellow & ulceration (necrobiosis lipoidica)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-6: LOR = + 2.71]
VI - Little skin pebbles on back of the hand / fingers (Huntley's papules)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-4: LOR = + 2.64]
VII - Locked finger, a.k.a. 'trigger finger' (stenosing tenosynovitis)
[Diabetes hand sign 7-3: LOR = +2.50]
VIII - Palmar dermatoglyphics: high density on thenar
[Diabetes hand sign 5-13: LOR = + 2.50]
IX - Palmar dermatoglyphics: radial arch on hypothenar
[Diabetes hand sign 5-11: LOR = + 2.47]
IX - Palmar dermatoglyphics: ulnar loop on hypothenar
[Diabetes hand sign 5-11: LOR = + 2.14]
TOP 10 HAND SIGNS
IN DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE 2:
(Ranked by 'Log Odds Ratio' = LOR)
I - Limited joint mobility (LJM)
[Diabetes hand sign 7-1: LOR = +3.36]
II- Terry's nails
[Diabetes hand sign 2-3: LOR = +3.09]
III - Pink patches on back of the hand / fingers (granuloma annulare lesions)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-3: LOR = + 2.73]
IV - Shiny patches, first: red-brown & painless, later: yellow & ulceration (necrobiosis lipoidica)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-6: LOR = + 2.71]
V - Little skin pebbles on back of the hand / fingers (Huntley's papules)
[Diabetes hand sign 6-4: LOR = + 2.64]
VI - Locked finger, a.k.a. 'trigger finger' (stenosing tenosynovitis)
[Diabetes hand sign 7-3: LOR = +2.50]
VII - Palm: radial arch on hypothenar
[Diabetes hand sign 5-11: LOR = + 2.28]
VIII - Simian line
[Diabetes hand sign 4-1: LOR = +2.24]
IX - Palmar dermatoglyphics: high density on thenar
[Diabetes hand sign 5-13: LOR = + 2.50]
X - Palmar dermatoglyphics: radial arch on hypothenar
[Diabetes hand sign 5-11: LOR = + 2.47]
These TOP 10 hand signs for Diabetes Mellitus type 1 & 2 show that skin abnormalities (combined with motoric problems) play a key role in recognizing Diabetes Mellitus.
NOTICE: Log Odds Ratios are calculated from the prevalence (%) among Diabetes patients & controls; more details are presented in the right column at the bottom of this page.
HAND SIGNS & HAND DIAGNOSTICS:
• Hand signs in DOWN SYNDROME!
_- Down syndrome case study 1
_- Down syndrome case study 2
• Hand signs in FRAGILE-X SYNDROME!
_- Fragile-X syndrome case study 1
_- Fragile-X syndrome case study 2
_(In people with autism 2% to 6% have Fragile-X syndrome!)
• Hand signs in DIABETES MELLITUS!
• Hand signs in RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS!
• Hand signs in PSORIASIS!
• Hand signs in SCHIZOPHRENIA!
HAND TEST:
• MARFAN SYNDROME hand test!
BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS:
• Hand constellations in Agreeableness!
• Hand constellations in Conscientiousness!
• Hand constellations in Extraversion!
• Hand constellations in Neuroticism!
• Hand constellations in Openness!
SIMIAN LINE INDEX:
INTRO: About the Simian Line (a.k.a. 'simian crease')
• HOW TO RECOGNIZE a 'complete' Simian Line?
• WHY PALM CREASE NAMED the Simian Line?
• BRIEF HISTORY of the Simian Line
• ETHNIC POPULATIONS & the Simian Line
• MEDICAL PROBLEMS & the Simian Line
• PSYCHOLOGY & the Simian Line
• PROJECTS related to the Simian Line
• SYNONYMS for the Simian Line
• FAMOUS Simian Line holders
MORE HAND DIAGNOSTICS:
• Understanding hand shape!
• The hand lines (palmar creases)
• The Sydney line
• Fingerprints (+ dermatoglyphics)
• The Hypothenar whorl
• What can finger length reveal?
• The 5th finger (pinky)
• The fingernail tutor
• The hand sign tutor: 300+ hand signs! [via 9 hand levels]
How to make a Palm Reading Assessment for DIABETES MELLITUS (Type 1 & 2) Key-elements of the hand in Diabetes Mellitus (type 1 & 2) in a nutshell: skin / nail problems and or motoric problems, palmar dermatoglyphic stereotypes below the ring finger & the hypothenar, high occurence of the simian crease. [Phantom picture for Diabetes Type 1 & 2 will be available later] Studies have shown that there not much difference between recognizing diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 from the hand only. An advanced hand diagnosis for Diabetes Mellitus requires a person to have multiple significant hand markers that follow the MAJOR REQUIREMENT + the additional requirements described below: MAJOR REQUIREMENT: The person requires to have significant hand markers for Diabetes Mellitus in at least three out of the seven dimensions of the hand; most likely a combination of the dimensions: SKIN QUALITY, FINGERNAILS, MOTORICS & DERMATOGLYPHICS. - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT A: The person requires to have at least one hand marker that relates to one of the following two perspectives: SKIN QUALITY (= hand perspective 6) or MOTORICS (= hand perspective 7) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT B: The person requires to have at least one hand marker that relates to FINGERNAILS (= hand perspective 2), DERMATOGLYPHICS (= hand perspective 5) or HAND LINES (= hand perspective 4). - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT C: The person requires to have at least one hand marker in the palm (or back of the hand) + at least one hand marker in the fingers. IMPORTANT: Even when all above REQUIREMENTS are fullfilled, then one can still NOT speak of a 'confirmed' hand diagnosis for Diabetes Mellitus: an additional health assessment beyond the hand is still requirement! Some of the 35 significant hand markers for Diabetes Mellitus that are listed below became known in medical science as a 'physical minor anomaly' (such as the simian crease & the Sydney line). But in general most of these individual hand markers can usually be described as harmless body characteristics - except for the markers described for perspectives 2, 6 and 7. • Hand perspective 1 - HAND SHAPE: - 1-1: Appearent hand shape asymmetry. • Hand perspective 2 - FINGERNAILS: - 2-1: Fungal infection of the nail (onychomycosis); - 2-2: Redness in proximal nail fold (chronic paronychia); - 2-3: White nail with small pink/brown distal band (Terry's nails); - 2-4: Blue lunula; - 2-5: Yellow nails + yellow skin; - 2-6: Spoon nail (koilonychia). • Hand perspective 3 - FINGER MORPHOLOGY: - 3-1: High finger length asymmetry: e.g. 2D:4D asymmetry. • Hand perspective 4 - MAJOR LINES: - 4-1: Simian crease; - 4-2: Sydney line. • Hand perspective 5 - DERMATOGLYPHICS: - 5-1: Fingers: radial loop on ringfinger; - 5-2: Fingers: radial loop on pinky; - 5-3: Fingers: high thumb minus pinky ridge count (high MD15); - 5-4: Palm: triradius c below ring finger is missing; - 5-5: Palm: ridge line C ends below ring finger (abbortive ridge line C); - 5-6: Palm: a-b ridge count summarized for both hands < 70 (ridge count between triradius below index finger & triradius below middle finger); - 5-7: Palm: 2 or 3 triradii on hypothenar; - 5-8: Palm: high positioned axial triradius; - 5-9: Palm: triradius t is missing; - 5-10: Palm: ulnar loop on hypothenar; - 5-11: Palm: radial arch on hypothenar; - 5-12: Palm: pattern in the hypothenar OR thenar of just one hand; - 5-13: Palm: high density on thenar. • Hand perspective 6 - SKIN QUALITY: - 6-1: Thick, waxy/thickening skin on back of the hand (sclerodactyly); - 6-2: Infections; - 6-3: Pink patches on back of the hand / fingers (granuloma annulare lesions); - 6-4: Little skin pebbles on back of the hand / fingers (Huntley's papules); - 6-5: Blisters (bullosis diabeticorum); - 6-6: Shiny patches, first: red-brown & painless, later: yellow & ulceration (necrobiosis lipoidica); - 6-7: Dramatic appearing hand infections (e.g. Tropical Diabetic Hand Syndrome). - 6-8: Dry scally palms. • Hand perspective 7 - MOTORICS: - 7-1: Neuropathy: loss of function, loss of movement / sensation (Tinel's sign, Phalen's test, preacher sign / prayer sign, limited joint mobility); - 7-2: Contracture of pinky and/or ring finger (Dupuytren's contracture); - 7-3: Locked finger, a.k.a. 'trigger finger' (stenosing tenosynovitis); - 7-4: Numbness, tingling and/or pain (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome); NOTICE: About 3% of the world population has diabetes mellitus, of which about 2.7% concerns Type 2 and 0.3% concerns Type 1. But in Down syndrome the occurence of diabetes type 1 is much higher (estimates indicate at least 4x times higher to up to 10%), therefore it is interesting to notice that 8 of the 26 hand markers in Down syndrome are also seen in the summary of hand markers for Diabetes Mellitus! The hand in RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS The hand in PSORIASIS The hand in DOWN SYNDROME The hand in FRAGILE-X SYNDROME Fingernails problems in Diabetes Mellitus |
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 17-36 %; controls: 6.8-7.0 % 1 LOG ODDS RATIO: +1.57 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 10.0 %; controls: +3.0 % 2 LOG ODDS RATIO: 1.28 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 2 patients: 10.0 %; controls: 0.5 % (rare in young people) 3 LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +3.09 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % 4 LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: males: 2.3-12.93 %, females: 1.0-12.0 %; controls: 0.3-2.0 % & 0.4-1.0 % 5-7 - Diabetic type 2 patients: males: 3.8-13.33 %, females: 0-14.23 %; controls: 0.3-2.0 % & 0.4-1.0 % 5-8,21 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +2.12 (average) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +2.24 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: males: 0.8, females: 4.0 %; controls: 3.8 % & 1.7 % 6 - Diabetic type 2 patients: males: 0, females: 7.6 %; controls: 3.8 % & 1.7 % 6 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1 (females only): +0.87 LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +0.34 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients (confirmed by glucose tolerance test): 6.2 %; controls: 0.3 % 7 LOG ODDS RATIO: +3.09 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients (confirmed by glucose tolerance test): 2.3 %; controls: 0 % 7 LOG ODDS RATIO: +3.16 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 2 patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 3.0-8.7 %; controls: 3.1-3.0 % 5-7 - Diabetic type 2 patients: 4.5-15.9 %; controls: 3.1-3.0 % 5-7 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +0.69 (average) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +1.28 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 0.5-36.6 %; controls: 0.4-8.0 % 5-7 - Diabetic type 2 patients: 1.3-34.6 %; controls: 0.4-8.0 % 5-7 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +1.65 (average) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +1.61 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: ? %; controls: ? % 5,6,10 - Diabetic type 2 patients: ? %; controls: ? % 5,6,10 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: ? (unknown) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: ? %; controls: ? % 5,6,10 - Diabetic type 2 patients: ? %; controls: ? % 5,6,10 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: ? (unknown) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: ? %; controls: ? % 5,6,10 - Diabetic type 2 patients: ? %; controls: ? % 5,6,10 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: ? (unknown) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 0.75 %; controls: 0.5 % 5 - Diabetic type 2 patients: 3.95 %; controls: 0.5 % 5 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +0.41 LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +2.10 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 13.5 %; controls: 1.8 % 5 - Diabetic type 2 patients: 11.6 %; controls: 1.8 % 5 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +2.14 LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +1.97 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 5.6 %; controls: 0.5 % 5 - Diabetic type 2 patients: 4.7 %; controls: 0.5 % 5 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +2.47 LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +2.28 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients (confirmed by glucose tolerance test): 36.7 %; controls: 9.9 % 7 LOG ODDS RATIO: +1.67 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 39.1 %; controls: 5.0 % 5 - Diabetic type 2 patients: 31.8 %; controls: 5.0 % 5 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +2.50 LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +2.19 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 33 %; controls: 0.5 % (rare) 16,17 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +4.58 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 3 %; controls: 0.2 % 18 LOG ODDS RATIO: +2.73 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 72-75 %; controls: 12-21 % 15 LOG ODDS RATIO: +2.64 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % 14,18 LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 7 %; controls: 0.5 % (rare) LOG ODDS RATIO: +2.71 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: ? %; controls: ? % LOG ODDS RATIO: ? (unknown) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients type 1: 21 %; controls: 0.8 % 19 LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +3.47 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic type 1 patients: 20-66 %; controls: 4 % 11,12,13 (+22) - Diabetic type 2 patients: 33-76 %; controls: 4 % 11,12,13 (+22) LOG ODDS RATIO type 1: +2.98 (average) LOG ODDS RATIO type 2: +3.36 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 3-32 %; controls: 1-7 % 14,22 LOG ODDS RATIO: +1.31 (average) | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 10-20 %; controls: 1-2 % 14,22 LOG ODDS RATIO: +2.50 | ||
Prevalence: - Diabetic patients: 11-21 %; controls: 5 % 14 LOG ODDS RATIO: +1.28 (average) | ||
© COPYRIGHT 2002-2017: |